/ about Free the Books

Free the Books

conjugating international copyright laws
As a Google Library Partner , The University of Texas Libraries will digitize at least one million books from the Libraries’ unique collections, starting with our Nettie Lee Benson Latin American Collection. This rich collection holds over 800,000 titles about and from Mexico, Central and South America and the Caribbean. Librarians, faculty and alumni acquired these works by gift, exchange and purchase over eight decades to create a comprehensive collection to support teaching and research at the university.

Current technologies enable us to provide virtual access to these collections for study anywhere, but a tangle of international treaties and copyright laws complicates our use and distribution of foreign works. There is little guidance to help us reliably identify which of our books are already in the public domain so we are piloting a project to develop new tools for ourselves and for anyone who wants to tackle these difficult public domain problems. We will document our process, our progress and our results on these pages along with links to web resources we find useful. We invite suggestions and comments from other Google Library Partners and anyone undertaking similar or related projects. Comment on our posts.

Email us at freethebooks@gmail.com. We are here; we are building an evidence base and we are looking for virtual partners!

A member of the University of Texas LibBlogs network




 / conjugating international copyright laws


Now the markets will have their go at orphan works

Google Book Search Example

Google Book Search Example

As I commented on Collectanea at the time that the latest Congressional effort to deal with orphan works failed, now it’s time to try a process other than legislative “compromise.” Public Knowledge did a fabulous job of describing the horse trading that goes on behind the scenes to try to get legislation past the numerous barriers. PK still holds out hope that next session the bills will come to reflect the perfect combination of freedom to use orphan works and protection for the interests of those copyright owners caught in the cross-fire between new technological capabilities and old-fashioned sloppiness about attribution and keeping contact information about owners up to date. “Who cared?” “Who knew we needed to care?” “We didn’t care — we didn’t need to.” My how things have changed.

So, Google Book Search is freeing itself from the constraints of a gazillion billion dollars worth of lawsuits and walking off into the bright sunshine of ‘tomorrow’s another day,’ arm and arm with the publishers and authors who still disagree with it about whether Google’s original plan was fair use, but hey, that plan is so 2004. It’s 2008 and almost 2009 and we’ve got some books to find, browse, read and download, some to buy and download (and pretty soon maybe buy in other ways besides download). So a new approach to orphans, at least orphan books. And as PK authors point out, this is just about books. They note we may still need legislation for the other kinds of media. But I give the markets a much better chance of success than legislation. Not just success as in, “oh, you actually reached an agreement that doesn’t allow one side to purposely cripple the other,” but success as in, “oh, you actually reached an agreement that will work, in practice, to enable identification and use of orphan books.” Not that it will be easy and without fits and starts (I have expressed my own concerns about the lack of transparency in the Book Rights Registy), but I think these book guys and gals have a much better sense of the benefits for everyone than the gangs that conspired to torpedo the legislative effort (and are therefor motivated to make it work, rather than motivated to make it not work). Well, let’s see what happens. At least something will happen.

comments

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>